close
作者: lollygagger (chivalry's alive) 看板: NBA
標題: [外絮] The Book of Spo
時間: Mon Jun 4 03:04:28 2012
http://0rz.tw/3pBHV ESPN.com
By Kevin Arnovitz, posted on May 30, 2012
Name: Erik Spoelstra
Birthdate: November 1, 1970
Is he an emotional leader or a tactician?
A disciple of Pat Riley, Spoelstra likes to set a tone, will traffic in
motivational mantras and definitely pays close attention to the emotional
pulse of his team. But he's a cool tactician at heart, one who earns his
team's confidence with his work ethic. The players generally respect that
Spoelstra spends his entire waking life trying to make it easier for these
guys to win. Superstars are more likely to respond to that quality than a
punchy fight song.
擅於激勵球員鬥志，還是以戰術見長?
Spo 喜歡用各式精神喊話營造氣氛、鼓舞士氣，對球員的信心指數非常小心在意，這
點師承油頭 Pat Riley。同時他頭腦冷靜，戰術能力其實不弱。十分敬業，只要人醒
著，就是在想怎麼幫球隊贏球，可謂苦心孤詣，這種工作態度頗受隊上敬重。其實
只要教練用心、敬業，通常球員還是會買帳的。
Is he intense or a go-along-get-along type?
Spoelstra projects a quiet intensity. You won't find any bulging veins or hot
collars, but he's what you could describe as serious. Despite that, he gets
along well with staff and players -- his long-standing relationship with
Dwyane Wade the best evidence. He's reserved, but not prickly and can be
one-of-the-guys when he chooses to.
他脾氣火爆，還是好好先生?
Spo 算不慍不火，在場邊很少看他氣急敗壞地怒吼，或是臉紅脖子粗地跳腳。用嚴肅
莊重來形容他應該比較貼切。除此之外，他跟球隊相處得很好，像跟Wade就合作了很
長的時間，足証人際溝通上沒什麼問題。含蓄內練，但不至於高傲無禮。興致一來，
他隨時可以跟你嘻嘻哈哈，打成一片。
Does he rely on systems, or does he coach ad hoc to his personnel?
This is Spoelstra's greatest trial as the head coach of the Heat. He highly
values systems -- he spent his summer in search of one. In almost any other
context, Spoelstra would develop an offensive architecture designed with
clean lines and an orderly flow. But with Wade and LeBron James as the two
most important pieces on the board, pious devotion to a system presents all
kinds of problems. So instead, Spoelstra spends his time finding creative
ways to get Wade and James the ball where they can exact the most damage in
the half court. He must accept that a good percentage of possessions will be
at the whims of his superstars, often when the stakes of those possessions
are at their highest. Spoelstra has an uncanny capacity to accept life's
inconvenient realities, but this must torment him a little bit.
他愛打團隊籃球，還是比較依賴特定球星?
這正是他身為炎焱教頭最大的試煉。他推祟團體戰，以他用功之勤（去年冠軍戰隱恨敗北
後，他花了整個夏天，遍訪名教練，尋求適合熱火的陣地戰），如果熱火換別個陣容，他
可以設計出優秀的進攻系統，讓人人都有球可打。問題是，現在熱火有 LBJ 跟 Wade 兩
巨頭，而「巨頭發威」跟「團體作戰」往往相生相剋，自古難以兩全，一個弄不好難保不
問題重重。於是 Spo 只好退而求其次，挖空心思，變著花樣，把球作給 LBJ、Wade, 讓
他們來大顯神威，英勇退敵。他不得不給雙王充份的開火權，尤其當戰況危急的時候，因
為「這樣能贏球」。Spo 其實很認份，清楚世事無法盡如人意，但你說他甘之如貽，那就
未必了。
Does he share decision-making with star players, or is he The Decider?
He doesn't have much of a choice, does he?
他跟巨頭有商有量，還是凡事他說了算?
你覺得他有的選嗎?
Does he prefer the explosive scorer or the lockdown defender?
Spoelstra tilts radically to the lockdown defender end of the spectrum.
Joel Anthony has been a personal project for years and, with Spoelstra's
encouragement and attention, has become one of the league's best defenders.
The patience shown with Mario Chalmers is, in many ways, an expression of
Spoelstra's commitment to defense. When the Heat needed to fill out a spot
on the wing, they went after Shane Battier, a Spoelstrite if there ever was
one.
他比較喜歡得分猛將，還是防守大鎖?
攻守兩端，Spo 極重防守。你看 Joel Anthony，這些年來在他細心調教下，已逐漸長成
聯盟頂尖的防守大將。另外，他給 Mario Chalmers很多上場時間，把 Shane Battier 安
排在兩翼，對防守的要求可見一斑。
Does he prefer a set rotation, or is he more likely to use his personnel
situationally?
"The rotation is the rotation," is one of Spoelstra's bread-and-butter remarks
for the media scrum. There are constants apparent in his substitution pattern,
but Spoelstra is an empiricist, so when there's enough evidence to suggest the
sequence isn't working, he'll make an adjustment.
他用兵死板，還是會視戰況靈活調度?
「我用人就是這樣，其實沒什麼好講的。」有時給媒體逼問之下，他就拿這句老掉牙
的話來搪塞。不難看出他用兵有固定的模式，但他也善於觀察印証，情況真的不對，
他還是會有所調整。
（下略, 太長翻不完啦）
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.166.71.63
※ 編輯: lollygagger 來自: 118.166.71.63 (06/04 03:07)
→ cola1230 :mario?= = 開玩笑嗎 前幾季先發常常被搶 06/04 03:06
→ cola1230 :街球王 阿露油 被幹鞋的BB 防守都沒他好阿 06/04 03:06
→ KevinLoveYou:才翻一半 06/04 03:06
→ cola1230 :講到他有點馬後砲 加強JA 八爺的意思= = 06/04 03:06
推 callmedance : 06/04 03:10
→ lollygagger :有空我再繼續啦 也不知大家愛不愛看 06/04 03:10
推 mark0912n :他被砲的點 都是反應太慢 06/04 03:24
→ mark0912n :分析對手戰術攻防設計都還不錯 但是臨場反應... 06/04 03:25
噓 nasmithed :爛斃了 誰寫的爛報導 06/04 03:26
推 el751013 :請樓上寫一篇?? 06/04 03:29
→ Atwo :隊上有三王 就只是個人形立牌 06/04 03:34
推 colpitis :lollygagger一系列的翻譯都很好看∼推 06/04 03:50
標題: [外絮] The Book of Spo
時間: Mon Jun 4 03:04:28 2012
http://0rz.tw/3pBHV ESPN.com
By Kevin Arnovitz, posted on May 30, 2012
Name: Erik Spoelstra
Birthdate: November 1, 1970
Is he an emotional leader or a tactician?
A disciple of Pat Riley, Spoelstra likes to set a tone, will traffic in
motivational mantras and definitely pays close attention to the emotional
pulse of his team. But he's a cool tactician at heart, one who earns his
team's confidence with his work ethic. The players generally respect that
Spoelstra spends his entire waking life trying to make it easier for these
guys to win. Superstars are more likely to respond to that quality than a
punchy fight song.
擅於激勵球員鬥志，還是以戰術見長?
Spo 喜歡用各式精神喊話營造氣氛、鼓舞士氣，對球員的信心指數非常小心在意，這
點師承油頭 Pat Riley。同時他頭腦冷靜，戰術能力其實不弱。十分敬業，只要人醒
著，就是在想怎麼幫球隊贏球，可謂苦心孤詣，這種工作態度頗受隊上敬重。其實
只要教練用心、敬業，通常球員還是會買帳的。
Is he intense or a go-along-get-along type?
Spoelstra projects a quiet intensity. You won't find any bulging veins or hot
collars, but he's what you could describe as serious. Despite that, he gets
along well with staff and players -- his long-standing relationship with
Dwyane Wade the best evidence. He's reserved, but not prickly and can be
one-of-the-guys when he chooses to.
他脾氣火爆，還是好好先生?
Spo 算不慍不火，在場邊很少看他氣急敗壞地怒吼，或是臉紅脖子粗地跳腳。用嚴肅
莊重來形容他應該比較貼切。除此之外，他跟球隊相處得很好，像跟Wade就合作了很
長的時間，足証人際溝通上沒什麼問題。含蓄內練，但不至於高傲無禮。興致一來，
他隨時可以跟你嘻嘻哈哈，打成一片。
Does he rely on systems, or does he coach ad hoc to his personnel?
This is Spoelstra's greatest trial as the head coach of the Heat. He highly
values systems -- he spent his summer in search of one. In almost any other
context, Spoelstra would develop an offensive architecture designed with
clean lines and an orderly flow. But with Wade and LeBron James as the two
most important pieces on the board, pious devotion to a system presents all
kinds of problems. So instead, Spoelstra spends his time finding creative
ways to get Wade and James the ball where they can exact the most damage in
the half court. He must accept that a good percentage of possessions will be
at the whims of his superstars, often when the stakes of those possessions
are at their highest. Spoelstra has an uncanny capacity to accept life's
inconvenient realities, but this must torment him a little bit.
他愛打團隊籃球，還是比較依賴特定球星?
這正是他身為炎焱教頭最大的試煉。他推祟團體戰，以他用功之勤（去年冠軍戰隱恨敗北
後，他花了整個夏天，遍訪名教練，尋求適合熱火的陣地戰），如果熱火換別個陣容，他
可以設計出優秀的進攻系統，讓人人都有球可打。問題是，現在熱火有 LBJ 跟 Wade 兩
巨頭，而「巨頭發威」跟「團體作戰」往往相生相剋，自古難以兩全，一個弄不好難保不
問題重重。於是 Spo 只好退而求其次，挖空心思，變著花樣，把球作給 LBJ、Wade, 讓
他們來大顯神威，英勇退敵。他不得不給雙王充份的開火權，尤其當戰況危急的時候，因
為「這樣能贏球」。Spo 其實很認份，清楚世事無法盡如人意，但你說他甘之如貽，那就
未必了。
Does he share decision-making with star players, or is he The Decider?
He doesn't have much of a choice, does he?
他跟巨頭有商有量，還是凡事他說了算?
你覺得他有的選嗎?
Does he prefer the explosive scorer or the lockdown defender?
Spoelstra tilts radically to the lockdown defender end of the spectrum.
Joel Anthony has been a personal project for years and, with Spoelstra's
encouragement and attention, has become one of the league's best defenders.
The patience shown with Mario Chalmers is, in many ways, an expression of
Spoelstra's commitment to defense. When the Heat needed to fill out a spot
on the wing, they went after Shane Battier, a Spoelstrite if there ever was
one.
他比較喜歡得分猛將，還是防守大鎖?
攻守兩端，Spo 極重防守。你看 Joel Anthony，這些年來在他細心調教下，已逐漸長成
聯盟頂尖的防守大將。另外，他給 Mario Chalmers很多上場時間，把 Shane Battier 安
排在兩翼，對防守的要求可見一斑。
Does he prefer a set rotation, or is he more likely to use his personnel
situationally?
"The rotation is the rotation," is one of Spoelstra's bread-and-butter remarks
for the media scrum. There are constants apparent in his substitution pattern,
but Spoelstra is an empiricist, so when there's enough evidence to suggest the
sequence isn't working, he'll make an adjustment.
他用兵死板，還是會視戰況靈活調度?
「我用人就是這樣，其實沒什麼好講的。」有時給媒體逼問之下，他就拿這句老掉牙
的話來搪塞。不難看出他用兵有固定的模式，但他也善於觀察印証，情況真的不對，
他還是會有所調整。
（下略, 太長翻不完啦）
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.166.71.63
※ 編輯: lollygagger 來自: 118.166.71.63 (06/04 03:07)
→ cola1230 :mario?= = 開玩笑嗎 前幾季先發常常被搶 06/04 03:06
→ cola1230 :街球王 阿露油 被幹鞋的BB 防守都沒他好阿 06/04 03:06
→ KevinLoveYou:才翻一半 06/04 03:06
→ cola1230 :講到他有點馬後砲 加強JA 八爺的意思= = 06/04 03:06
推 callmedance : 06/04 03:10
→ lollygagger :有空我再繼續啦 也不知大家愛不愛看 06/04 03:10
推 mark0912n :他被砲的點 都是反應太慢 06/04 03:24
→ mark0912n :分析對手戰術攻防設計都還不錯 但是臨場反應... 06/04 03:25
噓 nasmithed :爛斃了 誰寫的爛報導 06/04 03:26
推 el751013 :請樓上寫一篇?? 06/04 03:29
→ Atwo :隊上有三王 就只是個人形立牌 06/04 03:34
推 colpitis :lollygagger一系列的翻譯都很好看∼推 06/04 03:50
全站熱搜
留言列表
